How EvalOps compares to
other evaluation platforms
Honest comparison with LangSmith, Weights & Biases, Arize, Humanloop, and other evaluation platforms. We'll tell you when competitors fit better.
Request detailed comparisonWhat makes EvalOps different
Honest competitor breakdown
LangSmith
LangChain observability platform
EvalOps is framework-agnostic and designed for governance-first workflows with built-in CI/CD gates and attestation tracking.
Weights & Biases
ML experiment tracking and model registry
EvalOps focuses on production evaluation loops, not training experiments. Built for teams shipping AI systems, not training models from scratch.
Arize AI
ML observability and monitoring
EvalOps combines pre-release evaluation gates with production monitoring, and integrates directly into CI/CD pipelines to catch regressions before deploy.
Humanloop
Prompt management and evaluation
EvalOps captures full agent execution traces (prompts + tool calls + decisions), supports compliance workflows, and provides governance attestations for regulated environments.
Choose EvalOps when you need
audit-grade governance
When EvalOps wins
- ✓You need governed evaluation gates in CI/CD
- ✓You operate in regulated industries and require attestations
- ✓You run multi-step agents or orchestration beyond prompt → completion
- ✓You need audit-ready telemetry across providers
When competitors fit better
- •LangSmith: You're all-in on LangChain prototyping
- •Weights & Biases: You're focused on training ML models from scratch
- •Arize: You only need post-deployment monitoring
- •Humanloop: You're iterating prompts with human labeling loops
This comparison reflects our honest assessment as of 2025. Contact us for updates or corrections.